[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710301531.58957.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:31:57 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de, rajesh.shah@...el.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pci-disable-decode-of-io-memory-during-bar-sizing.patch
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:22 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > The per-device flag is fine with me, but I should make something
> > clear:
> >
> > MMCONFIG IS NOT BROKEN!
>
> Trust me, it is.
>
> The particular problem _you_ had with it is only a small small part
> of the bugs we have had.
>
> > What's broken is our PCI probing with certain address space layouts
> > that include MMCONFIG space.
>
> No. You really don't see the big picture. There's been tons of
> problems with MMCONFIG. Like the fact that other devices have their
> IO regions registered on top of it, because the MMCONFIG thing was
> done as a hidden resource. Or the fact that the area claimed was too
> small. Or too large. Or not listed at all.
Yeah, that's definitely a problem, and would be a firmware bug. There's
no doubt that firmwares have had trouble with this in the past, but
given that Vista now relies on this stuff working, it's a lot more
likely to be reliable in current and future systems.
> The whole thing is a total disaster. I told Intel engineers literally
> *years* ago to not do that idiotic "hidden IO resources that are
> described by firmware that then inevitably gets things wrong", and
> yet what happens? Every single time.
I don't disagree there. I'm just saying the actual mechanism is fine
(as illustrated by the numerous non-PC ports of Linux), and this
particular problem, at least, isn't really specific to how MMCONFIG is
described or configured by the firmware and OS, it's simply a Linux
problem.
But like I said, the per-device flag Arjan suggested is fine with me...
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists