[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071030160442.e51e2b45.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:04:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] 0/4 fs/ioctl.c coding style, function
renaming/factoring
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:39:55 -0400
Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu> wrote:
> This series of 4 proposed patches (take 3) changes fs/ioctl.c and Unionfs as
> follows.
The problem is of course that you need these in your tree for ongoing
development, but 2.6.25 is months away. They look OK to me so I suggest
that you go ahead and commit them to your git tree and I'll drop them
again. Please resend them for merging in the 2.6.25-rc1 merge window.
unionfs has been hanging around for a long time now and we should work
towards getting it into 2.6.25 or dropped from -mm (sorry). Right now
would be a great time to get this process underway.
I have only a partial memory of what the sticking points were, and I have
basically zero knowledge of what was done to address them. So could you
please, over the next few weeks:
- Send out a description of what the issues were, and how they were addressed
- If issues remain, describe their impact and possible workarounds, all
that stuff.
- If it mostly-survives all that design-level review and consideration
then let's go for it: get all the patches cleaned up and consolidated and
get them emailed out for review no later than 2.6.24-rc5.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists