[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071031095517.GA5817@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:55:17 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Lorenzo Allegrucci <l.allegrucci@...il.com>,
Bj?rn <askadar@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 performance regression
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2007 18:54, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
> > Hi, sorry if this is a faq but reading
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/7.0%20Preview.pdf (slides 17,
> > 18)
> > looks like 2.6.23 is having a performance regression on MySQL and
> > PostgreSQL benchmarks. Has anyone investigated these?
>
> I think Ingo was looking into them. I'm just in the middle of building
> a new setup to investigate some performance issues too, so I hope to
> look at this.
>
> Apparently it did go unnoticed during CFS testing, unfortunately.
> Although now it has been brought to light, I think 2.6.24 is supposed
> to be better (although it now gets worse on other things).
yep. For those who fear the 1 million lines of code flux of 2.6.24,
here's a backport of the scheduler changes to 2.6.23:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/devel/sched-cfs-v2.6.23.1-v22.1-rc0.patch
Lorenzo, could you please try that report back your reports? Thanks,
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists