linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CFS : Use NSEC_PER_MSEC and NSEC_PER_SEC in kernel/sched.c and kernel/sysctl.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071031102035.GD5817@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:20:35 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS : Use NSEC_PER_MSEC and NSEC_PER_SEC in
	kernel/sched.c and kernel/sysctl.c


* Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:

> 1) hardcoded 1000000000 value is used five times in places where 
> NSEC_PER_SEC might be more readable.
>
> 2) A conversion from nsec to msec uses the hardcoded 1000000 value, which 
> is a candidate for NSEC_PER_MSEC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/