linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/33] mm: allow PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1193827359.27652.129.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:42:39 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/33] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context

On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:51 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007 03:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Allow PF_MEMALLOC to be set in softirq context. When running softirqs from
> > a borrowed context save current->flags, ksoftirqd will have its own
> > task_struct.
> 
> 
> What's this for? Why would ksoftirqd pick up PF_MEMALLOC? (I guess
> that some networking thing must be picking it up in a subsequent patch,
> but I'm too lazy to look!)... Again, can you have more of a rationale in
> your patch headers, or ref the patch that uses it... thanks

Right, I knew I was forgetting something in these changelogs.

The network stack does quite a bit of packet processing from softirq
context. Once you start swapping over network, some of the packets want
to be processed under PF_MEMALLOC.

See patch 23/33.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)