lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0710310653190.12724@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:58:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump_stack on panic


--
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:15:13AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:14:04AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > One (mostly psychological, but still serious) problem is that stack
> > > dumps make panics always look like kernel bugs.  But there are panics
> > > which are definitely not kernel bugs: like the popular cannot mount
> > > root or machine checks or a couple of others.
> >
> > But that one really shouldn't be a panic anyway.  The panic alone
> > is psycologically bad enough for users.  I think it would be best to
> > have a simple scanf loop asking for another root device..
>
> Then you couldn't recover with panic=30 from it.
>
> Besides even if you fix that one there are others, like machine checks
> where it is impossible to recover.

Thinking about this more. Of the Linux users I asked, they think a kernel
panic is a bug in the kernel anyway (or at least something in the kernel
went wrong).  So if panics will point users to the kernel anyway, then why
leave out possible vital information from those panics that were caused by
an actual kernel bug.

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ