[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1193791667.23935.383.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:47:47 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 -v5] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI
runtime services
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:58 +0000, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2007 05:55, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > +static inline unsigned long native_get_wallclock(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long retval;
> > +
> > + if (efi_enabled)
> > + retval = efi_get_time();
> > + else
> > + retval = mach_get_cmos_time();
> > +
> > + return retval;
> > +}
>
> mach_get_cmos_time() is itself an inline, and a _large_ one
> (~20 LOC with macro and function calls).
>
> efi_get_time() is an inline too, although strange one:
> it is declared inline *only* in efi.c file:
> inline unsigned long efi_get_time(void)
> (yes, just inline, not static/extern),
> while efi.h has normal extern for it:
> extern unsigned long efi_get_time(void);
>
> Is it supposed to be like that?
efi_get_time is no longer inline in this patch. See efi.c of this patch.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists