[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071031131947.35a521c9@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:19:47 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: add filter function to groups
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:37:36 +0100,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> > mask_out() would also imply that the common use case is to have all
> > attributes in the group created and that you need to take action to
> > have an attribute not created.
>
> Here you have a point. But James has a point too when he says:
> | We basically want to show capability by which file is present.
Currently, if you register an attribute group, all of the attributes
will show up. I find it more intuitive to have to block some attributes
explicitely if I want to have more control, but the original logic is
fine with me as well, if most people prefer that :)
> Anyway, /if/ the reverse logic is preferred, it shouldn't be called
> "mask_out()" but rather "is_masked()" or "is_hidden()" or the like.
Sure. is_masked() would be fine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists