lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200710311149.23006.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:49:22 +1100 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check. On Saturday 27 October 2007 03:29:04 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > The kernel only ever supports 1 version of the boot protocol > so there is no need to check the boot protocol revision to > see if a feature is supported. OK, I'm completely confused, so this is probably a v. dumb question. Doesn't this boot header come from the boot loader? Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists