[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0710311237010.17800@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:39:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump_stack on panic
--
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > I've had too many issues in development where I hit a panic and it
> > gives me nothing to tell me why.
> >
> > At the very least, we should have a dump_stack in areas that are
> > usually caused by kernel bugs. For example, killing an interrupt
> > handler.
> >
>
> here's the deal.... the killing of an interrupt handler because of an
> oops THEN causes a panic. If you dump stack AGAIN, you have 2 stack
> traces, with the first one being the real good one, and the second one
> being.. well more crappy... so you proposal just dropped the good
> stacktrace off the screen in favor of a worse one...
Could be just a development glitch on my part, but there were times (IIRC)
I would not get a dump from a fault inside the interrupt handler, but I
would get the report of the killing of the interrupt handler.
Seems that I need to start recording the issues I've had with a kernel bug
not dumping a stack and doing a panic (which did nothing). And then I can
get back to you ;-)
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists