[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071031123359.3954befc@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:33:59 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Johnson <djohnson+linux-kernel@...starentnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bin Guo <bguo@...starentnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:43:51 -0400
Dave Johnson <djohnson+linux-kernel@...starentnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> Depending on the network driver, I'm seeing different behavior if
> a .1q packet is received to an PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, ETH_P_ALL socket.
>
>
> On devices what do not use NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX, the packet socket gets
> the complete packet with vlan tag included as the driver simply calls
> netif_receive_skb() or equivilant. packet_rcv() then gets the whole
> thing vlan tag included and sends this through the socket.
>
> vlan_skb_recv() also gets these all and will drop them because there
> are no vlans configured.
>
The VLAN acceleration grabs and hides the tag. It is a design flaw
that should be fixed, feel free to post a patch.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists