linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071031125907.ba953d4a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:59:07 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, adaplas@....net, ak@...e.de,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, mouli@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:

> Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been
> in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be
> merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not
> merged into mainline because the 32-bit boot protocol has not been done.
> 
> But now, the 32-bit boot protocol has been merged into mainline. So can
> this patchset be merged into mainline kernel now?
> 

I stopped paying attention, sorry.  Have all the outstanding issues been
addressed?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/