lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4727D926.6050004@sina.com.cn> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:23:50 +0800 From: tgh <wwwwww4187@...a.com.cn> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> CC: Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 30/44] xen: Add support for preemption Thank for your reply and I still have several questions > Yes, that's the normal mode of operation. The hypervisor will timeslice > multiple vcpus onto a single vcpu. > that is ,the VM could be preempted by xen,and could xen hypervisor also be preempted to reschedule other vm or xen kernel thread?and are there the counterpart abstractions in xen for kernel thread in linux? > This patch doesn't relate to that; it's whether a Xen Linux guest's > kernel can be preempted to reschedule processes while running under Xen. > that is ,the patch makes the guest's kernel, rather than xen, be able to be preempted ,is it right? Thanks in advance > The normal xen-unstable or vendor Xen kernels don't support this, but > the mainline kernel with paravirt_ops/xen support does. > > J > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists