linux-kernel - [PATCH] dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1193788979.5623.43.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:02:59 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dump_stack on panic

Is there any reason why we don't do a dump_stack on panic?

I find this soooo useful in the -rt patch, where Ingo has placed a
dump_stack on panic. With mainline, when I hit a panic, I don't always
know how it got there. So I find myself adding the dump_stack and trying
to create the bug again.

This patch simply adds dump_stack to panic.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 6f6e03e..bd481d7 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
 	vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, args);
 	va_end(args);
 	printk(KERN_EMERG "Kernel panic - not syncing: %s\n",buf);
+	dump_stack();
 	bust_spinlocks(0);
 
 	/*


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/