[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4729F133.3060308@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:30:59 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ak@...e.de, mingo@...e.hu,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, lguest@...abs.org,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, zach@...are.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, jun.nakajima@...el.com, glommer@...il.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/16] read/write_crX, clts and wbinvd for 64-bit paravirt
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> I in fact have seen bugs with mixed reads and writes to the same cr,
> (cr4), but adding the volatile
> flag to the read function seemed to fix it.
Well, volatile will make a read be repeated rather than caching the
previous value, but it has no effect on ordering.
> Yet, I agree with you that
> the theorectical problem exists for the reorder, and your proposed fix
> seems fine (although if we're really desperate about memory usage, we
> can use a char instead a int and save 3 bytes!)
Sure. Ideally the compiler would never even generate a reference to it,
and it could just be extern, but in practice the compiler will generate
references sometimes.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists