[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0711010901290.3342@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
cc: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory from gdb
causes unkillable spinning
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> Untested patch follows
Ok, this looks ok.
Except I would remove the VM_MAYSHARE bit from the test.
That whole bit should go, in fact.
We used to make it something different: iirc, a read-only SHARED mapping
was downgraded to a non-shared mapping, because we wanted to avoid some of
the costs we used to have with the VM implementation (actually, I think it
was various filesystems that don't like shared mappings because they don't
have a per-page writeback). But we left the VM_MAYSHARE bit on, to get
/proc/<pid>/mmap things right.
Or something like that. I forget the details. But I *think* we don't
actually need this any more.
But basically, the "right" way to test for shared mappings is historically
to just test the VM_MAYSHARE bit - but not *both* bits. Because VM_SHARE
may have been artificially cleared.
Somebody should double-check my memory.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists