[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <832119.21078.qm@web36614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...il.com>,
Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...il.com>
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
--- Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...il.com> wrote:
> Improvements to the single security framework are getting over looked.
Please post proposed patches.
> I would have personally though selinux would have done Posix file
> capabilities as a general service to all.
Posix capabilities predate SELinux. SELinux is not interested in
Posix capabilities.
> But no IBM had to do it.
Err, no. It was done by Andrew Morgan back in the dark ages.
Why on earth do you think IBM did it?
> ...
OK, you have all the answers. Show us some code or STFU.
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists