[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071101.000118.208338243.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: clameter@....com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
penberg@...helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu
access overhead
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/allocpercpu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/allocpercpu.c 2007-10-31 20:53:16.565486654 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/allocpercpu.c 2007-10-31 21:00:27.553486484 -0700
...
> @@ -37,7 +42,7 @@ enum unit_type { FREE, END, USED };
>
> static u8 cpu_alloc_map[UNITS_PER_CPU] = { 1, };
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpu_alloc_map_lock);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_area)[UNITS_PER_CPU];
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long long, cpu_area)[UNITS_PER_CPU];
>
> #define CPU_DATA_OFFSET ((unsigned long)&per_cpu__cpu_area)
>
This hunk helped the sparc64 looping OOPS I was getting, but cpus hang
in some other fashion soon afterwards.
I'll try to debug this some more later, I've dumped enough time into
this already :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists