[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711010813130.5103@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:17:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...il.com>
cc: casey@...aufler-ca.com, Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...il.com>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static
interface)
On Nov 1 2007 12:51, Peter Dolding wrote:
>
>This is above me doing code. No matter how many fixes I do to the
>core that will not fix dysfunction in the LSM section. Strict
>policies on fixing the main security model will be required.
If there is no one wanting to fix the existing code, then the
perceived problem is not a problem.
Or to put it another way:
"You talk the talk, but do you also walk the walk?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists