| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9D7649D18729DE4BB2BD7B494F7FEDC295BE93@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:01:31 +0800 From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: <hpa@...or.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <adaplas@....net>, <ak@...e.de>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <mouli@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org] >On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800 >"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote: > >> Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been >> in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be >> merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not >> merged into mainline because the 32-bit boot protocol has not been done. >> >> But now, the 32-bit boot protocol has been merged into mainline. So can >> this patchset be merged into mainline kernel now? >> > >I stopped paying attention, sorry. Have all the outstanding issues been >addressed? That's all right. I think there is no big issue with this patchset, just a framebuffer driver and the document. Best Regards, Huang Ying - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists