linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] slub: fix leakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slub: fix leakage

The fix against mm:


SLUB: Fix memory leak by not reusing cpu_slab

Fix the memory leak that may occur when we attempt to reuse a cpu_slab
that was allocated while we reenabled interrupts in order to be able to
grow a slab cache. The per cpu freelist may contain objects and in that
situation we may overwrite the per cpu freelist pointer loosing objects.
This only occurs if we find that the concurrently allocated slab fits
our allocation needs.

If we simply always deactivate the slab then the freelist will be properly
reintegrated and the memory leak will go away.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>

---
 mm/slub.c |   19 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c	2007-11-03 11:49:20.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c	2007-11-03 11:49:29.000000000 -0700
@@ -1529,25 +1529,8 @@ static noinline unsigned long get_new_sl
 		return 0;
 
 	*pc = c = get_cpu_slab(s, smp_processor_id());
-	if (c->page) {
-		/*
-		 * Someone else populated the cpu_slab while we
-		 * enabled interrupts, or we have gotten scheduled
-		 * on another cpu. The page may not be on the
-		 * requested node even if __GFP_THISNODE was
-		 * specified. So we need to recheck.
-		 */
-		if (node_match(c, node)) {
-			/*
-			 * Current cpuslab is acceptable and we
-			 * want the current one since its cache hot
-			 */
-			discard_slab(s, page);
-			return slab_lock(c->page);
-		}
-		/* New slab does not fit our expectations */
+	if (c->page)
 		flush_slab(s, c);
-	}
 	c->page = page;
 	return slab_lock(page) | FROZEN;
 }

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/