[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711031904470.14407@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 19:09:57 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: fix Objects count
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> > The count of active Objects shown by Slub's slabinfo is too approximate,
> > because each cpu slab is counted as all in use, even when lots are free.
> > That makes tracing leaks harder than it need be.
>
> True but that is the way it is for performance reasons.
I was afraid you might say something like that.
Perhaps it'll be a patch I need to use in my own builds.
Though I'd have thought others would want that accuracy too.
Didn't SLAB give it? (The "r*gr*ss**n" word!)
> > Add a free count into kmem_cache_cpu (which doesn't enlarge it on 64-bit),
> > to keep that count in the hot and dirty per-cpu cacheline.
>
> Adds to much overhead to the fast paths
You've come to that conclusion very quickly!
Any numbers to back it up?
> and will make the current optimizations in mm impossible.
I'll have to wait and see what those are: you move too fast for me.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists