[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <472BFA4B.9040506@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:34:19 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Having access to the same IPCs in different pid namespaces won't work.
> Having access to the same filesystem in different IPC namespaces won't work.
> Having access to the same UID namespace in different VFS namespaces won't work.
> Having access to the same <any> namespace in different <many others> namespace
> wont' work.
> [...]
Then explicitly prevent the cases which cannot work in the clone()
calls. Yes, giving people rope to shoot themselves is a Unix tradition
but it's so unnecessary in this case and will only cause support
problems for innocent people.
I bet the result will be that if you have a separate PID namespace you
need to enforce every other namespace as well. There are simply too
many dependencies.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHK/pL2ijCOnn/RHQRAtp6AKC8QIRvJa4qVUSx9IVpRq6X+6HPGQCff/hT
m2tpKWmeM+xAfS5ICvB0NVk=
=5ozn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists