[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18222.2107.914484.284023@zebedee.pink>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 17:58:19 +0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomash Brechko <tomash.brechko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?
Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > Has it already been decided who will do this audit, and when this
> > audit will happen ? Has a target date been set when this audit
> > should be complete, or is the completion of this audit a
> > requirement for the release of a specific gcc version ?
>
> I am told that the gcc people realized that was indeed a bug
> (people were able to show problems even in non-threaded
> environments with mprotect()), and have now fixed it in the current
> gcc sources. That still leaves the old versions with potential
> problems, but I think it makes it much less interesting to audit
> for these things.
We're back-porting the patch to all open branches. However, this
patch only affects one paticular case where gcc introduces a data
race; we're sure there are others not fixed.
Andrew.
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists