[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0711051035090.15101@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:36:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mikael Petterson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Well, the 32-bit code needs to set up its own stack, and only it knows where
> it wants its stack; we don't guarantee that the stack is valid when we enter
> the 32-bit code and we're entering with both INT and NMI disabled (requiring a
> stack would probably break all existing users of the 32-bit entrypoint.)
I agree. But it would be nice if some basic instructions still worked: as
is, you cannot even do things like reloading %eflags, because the only way
to do that requires a stack.
> However, that being said, doing so is trivial, and it might help some
> debugging hack; anything that makes debugging easier is a Good Thing[TM].
Yeah. Even if it was just re-using the boot-time stack area temporarily,
just to give code the choice to use a common set of instructions.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists