| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <293742.55428.qm@web50101.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:52:01 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: dougthompson@...ssion.com, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] move edac.txt DOCUMENTATION two levels up Interesting At the time I submitted it there was a big discussion on just how messed up the documentation directory was, inconsistent and not well laid out. Then more discussion on how it could be laid out in relation to where various subsystem were laid out (ie drivers doc directory like there was a drivers src directory and the like). Therefore I placed it following that pattern. So what I am hearing is that documentation for a subsystem should just continue to be dumped into one directory with everything else. Okay, if that is the goal, I am fine with, but things are pretty jumbled up in there. I will know where it is at least. doug t --- Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:06:08 +0100 > Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote: > > > There's no reason for edac.txt for being at this unusual place. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> > > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com> > > W1DUG - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists