linux-kernel - Re: "Fix ATAPI transfer lengths" causes CD writing regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <472E5E5C.8040308@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:05:48 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	albertl@...l.com, albertcc@...ibm.com,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "Fix ATAPI transfer lengths" causes CD writing regression

Alan Cox wrote:
>> Maybe we could set a limit here. If the ATAPI device keeps DRQ=1 and
>> exceeds the limit, we consider it as HSM violation and have EH handle it.
> 
> On a DMA transfer its basically out of our control (and a PIO drain will
> lock some controllers solid until power cycle),

Do such controllers lock up on PIO draining after PIO transfers too?
Can you tell which are those controllers?

> but on PIO we know we
> never set a chunk size over 64K, so if we exceed 64K its time to apply a
> larger hammer

Draining is related to the amount of data the drive responds not to the
chunk size.  I agree 64k should be enough for most cases but I think
there can be corner cases where this doesn't hold.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/