[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47309608.9030200@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:27:52 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mikael Petterson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> The ELF note format is sane enough, although it looks like it's not
>> self-terminating, so we'd either need an offset and a length field, or
>> adopt the convention that namesz = descsz = type = 0 terminates the
>> block (I prefer the latter, myself.)
>
> Hm, I think offset+length would be better: it's how they're represented
> in a normal ELF file, so you can just extract the length if you're
> extracting the notes. Also, generating a terminating note with the
> current linker-based notes machinery would be a bit of a pain.
.notes : {
*(.note.*)
. = ALIGN(4);
LONG(0);
LONG(0);
LONG(0);
}
Am I missing something?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists