[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <472FBC83.5060509@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:59:47 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mikael Petterson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Nailing down the interface as hard as possible is a good idea, to
>>> avoid tying your hands for the future.
>>
>> Erm, I guess I see what you mean, but it comes to the effect of tying
>> your hands now in a specific way, rather than having them tied in an
>> unknown way later on...
>
> Sort of. The problem is you can frequently not
>
>> But I hadn't noticed the 32-bit boot protocol spec go in. Unfortunately
>> it isn't useful for booting a pv Xen guest; I just mailed my
>> comments. I hope we can iterate this to something more generally
>> useful before
>> getting too wedded to the current protocol.
>
> I'm not so sure about that. Xen PV is rather fundamentally a
> different beast, hence the platform field recently added to the protocol.
Hm, OK. So make this predicated on "hardware subarchitecture == PC".
>
> This is addressed by the "don't reload segments" bit in LOADFLAGS.
OK.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists