linux-kernel - Re: Patch tags [was writeout stalls in current -git]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <661de9470711060903w73f6eca4r83a9bdd777bd5366@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:33:51 +0530
From:	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch tags [was writeout stalls in current -git]

> This seems like as good an opportunity as any to toss my patch tags
> document out there one more time.  I still think it's a good idea to
> codify some sort of consensus on what these tags mean...
>
> jon
>

[snip]

> +By offering my Reviewed-by: tag, I state that:
> +
> + (a) I have carried out a technical review of this patch to evaluate its
> +     appropriateness and readiness for inclusion into the mainline kernel.
> +
> + (b) Any problems, concerns, or questions relating to the patch have been
> +     communicated back to the submitter.  I am satisfied with the
> +     submitter's response to my comments.
> +
> + (c) While there may be things that could be improved with this submission,
> +     I believe that it is, at this time, (1) a worthwhile modification to
> +     the kernel, and (2) free of known issues which would argue against its
> +     inclusion.
> +
> + (d) While I have reviewed the patch and believe it to be sound, I do not
> +     (unless explicitly stated elsewhere) make any warranties or guarantees
> +     that it will achieve its stated purpose or function properly in any
> +     given situation.

How about adding a Commented-on-by?

Initial version(s) that are not suitable or still shaping up are
commented-on by several people. A person who comments on one version
might not do a thorough review of the entire code, but through a
series of comments has contributed by pushing the developer in the
correct direction.

Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/