[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pryom8j3.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:07:12 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat: optimize fat_count_free_clusters()
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>> +/* 128kb is the whole sectors for FAT12 and FAT16 */
>> +#define FAT_READA_SIZE (128 * 1024)
>> +
>> +static void fat_ent_reada(struct super_block *sb, struct fat_entry *fatent,
>> + unsigned long reada_blocks)
>> +{
>> + struct fatent_operations *ops = MSDOS_SB(sb)->fatent_ops;
>> + sector_t blocknr;
>> + int i, offset;
>> +
>> + ops->ent_blocknr(sb, fatent->entry, &offset, &blocknr);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < reada_blocks; i++)
>> + sb_breadahead(sb, blocknr + i);
>> +}
>
> You might find that it's simpler and faster to call
> page_cache_sync_readahead() against sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping.
>
> Or maybe not - that requires a struct file_ra_state. We _used_ to have a
> nice simple read-some-stuff-into-pagecache function which didn't need an
> ra_state but that seems to have disappeared in the various recent readahead
> churn. Oh well.
Yes. I found it, but I gave up for now by file_ra_state. Also I'd like
to use a large block to read FAT. I'll rethink this code after large
block was merged.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists