linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071106204242.GA18743@Krystal>
Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:42:42 -0500
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES (take 2)

* Haavard Skinnemoen (hskinnemoen@...el.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:03:45 -0400
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> 
> > take 2, using def_bool this time.
> 
> Currently, avr32 doesn't include kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation, but
> defines KPROBES in arch/avr32/Kconfig.debug instead. I want to bring
> avr32 in sync with everyone else, but that will obviously conflict with
> this patchset.
> 
> Are these patches about to get merged or should I just send my stuff
> upstream and ask you to rebase afterwards?
> 

I have not posted them to Andrew yet. I can do it right away, so you
could rebase on them.

Mathieu


> Håvard

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/