[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47301C7F.3080705@openvz.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:49:19 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Having access to the same IPCs in different pid namespaces won't work.
>> Having access to the same filesystem in different IPC namespaces won't work.
>> Having access to the same UID namespace in different VFS namespaces won't work.
>> Having access to the same <any> namespace in different <many others> namespace
>> wont' work.
>> [...]
>
>
> Then explicitly prevent the cases which cannot work in the clone()
> calls. Yes, giving people rope to shoot themselves is a Unix tradition
> but it's so unnecessary in this case and will only cause support
> problems for innocent people.
:)
> I bet the result will be that if you have a separate PID namespace you
> need to enforce every other namespace as well. There are simply too
> many dependencies.
I think, that Ted's proposal (about the "namespaces compatibility matrix") is
better. I'd prefer knowing of what can stop working in case I do something
rather that forcedly having my hands off this.
Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists