[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711071709.47192.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:09:46 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@...il.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Dor Laor <dor.laor@...ranet.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Use of virtio device IDs
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 16:40:13 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > but FWIW: This is a major motivation for the reason that the
> > IOQ stuff I posted a while back used strings for device identification
> > instead of a fixed length, centrally managed namespace like PCI
> > vendor/dev-id. Then you can just name your device something reasonably
> > unique (e.g. "qumranet::veth", or "ibm-pvirt-clock").
>
> I dislike strings. They make it look as if you have a nice extensible
> interface, where in reality you have a poorly documented interface which
> leads to poor interoperability.
Yes, you end up with exactly names like "qumranet::veth"
and "ibm-pvirt-clock". I would recommend looking very hard at /proc, Open
Firmware on a modern system, or the Xen store, to see what a lack of
limitation can do to you :)
> We will support non-pci for s390, but in order to support Windows and
> older Linux PCI is necessary.
The aim is that PCI support is clean, but that we're not really tied to PCI.
I think we're getting closer with the recent config changes.
Cheers,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists