linux-kernel - 2.6.24-rc2=another train wreck with amanda

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <200711070649.02136.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:49:01 -0500
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.24-rc2=another train wreck with amanda

Greetings;

I have this line in my /etc/modprobe.conf:
options dm-mod major=238

And I had a fsckup while building 2.6.24-rc2 cuz I thought it needed to be 
based on 2.6.23.1 that has made 2.6.24-rc2 the only kernel that will boot 
without a panic, killing init message.

I can survive that, but amanda (tar) went bonkers last night and tried to do a 
level 0 on everything, which is about 50GB, but its virtual tape size is only 
11GB.

The last time this happened that line above fixed the device mapper to a 
stable address at a major of 238 which tar was happy with.

An ls -l of /dev/mapper:
[root@...ote /]# ls -l /dev/mapper
total 0
crw------- 1 root root  10, 62 Nov  6 23:40 control
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 238,  0 Nov  6 23:40 VolGroup00-LogVol00
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 238,  1 Nov  6 23:40 VolGroup00-LogVol01

So that hasn't changed, so what did?  Amanda itself hasn't been changed in 
several months, running the 20070727 snapshot of amanda-2.5.2p1 all this 
time.  Tar was updated by smart or yumex 2 or 3 days back, so it worked 
correctly after the update.  That leaves something in 2.6.24-rc2.  I didn't 
build rc1.

Other than that, rc2 seems stable.  But auditd failed to start in the bootup 
sequence. I think that's minor and may predate this particular kernel.  
However, selinux did a relabel before it booted, could that be the cause?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/