linux-kernel - Re: [patch] audit support for SH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071107152439.GA28272@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:24:39 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc:	Yuichi Nakamura <ynakam@...achisoft.jp>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxsh-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Al Viro <aviro@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] audit support for SH

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:15:33AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2007 12:04:46 am Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
> > I found syscall audit does not work on SH(SuperH).
> > I made patch to support syscall audit for SH.
> 
> I think this is close, but it looks like you missed the syscall classification 
> piece. You can find an example here:
> 
> arch/x86_64/kernel/audit.c
> 
> Its used for determining which syscalls we are interested in for watches. 
> 
Looking at this, it seems like the classification stuff for 32-bit is
generic, it's just the compat bits that are special cased and wrap back
in through the 32-bit classifier.

Is there any point in keeping the 32-bit audit.c rather than simply
moving it to kernel/ or lib/ and leaving the arch/ bits as compat
wrappers only?

At least powerpc, x86, and ia64 look like they could go that way.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/