[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711071018001.9110@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:18:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:06:10 -0800 (PST)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > How exactly can an anonymous page ever become file backed?
> >
> > When they get assigned a swap entry.
>
> That does not change their status. They're still swap backed.
If they are swap backed then they have a backing store on disk. They are
file backed in some sense.
> > > > Do ramfs pages count as memory backed?
> > >
> > > Since ramfs pages cannot be evicted from memory at all, they
> > > should go into the "noreclaim" page set.
> >
> > Which LRU do they go on.
>
> With the patch set from last weekend, the file LRU.
Argh.
> With the patch set later this week, they'll be in the
> "noreclaim" page set, which is never scanned by the VM.
That sounds better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists