linux-kernel - Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200711071830.lA7IU1Di023742@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:30:01 -0500
From:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To:	Paul Albrecht <albrecht@...1.com>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	unionfs@...esystems.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode() 

In message <1194448467.3140.6.camel@...recht.rdi1.com>, Paul Albrecht writes:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Paul Albrecht <albrecht@...1.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a
> > > union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing.
> > 
> > Is that with or without this patch?
> 
> Without ... what's the difference? I asked a specific question about the
> test set that was used to validate unionfs and your fix.  
> 
> Paul Albrecht

Paul,

I'll check out the readahead stuff shortly.  I doubt the iget patch has
anything to do with it.

Cheers,
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/