[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071108121117.GG2479@hacking>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:11:17 +0800
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: fix
sysfs_show_{available,current}_clocksources() buffer overflow
problem
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:47:41PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:53:40PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
>>Hi,every one.
>> I found that there is a buffer overflow problem in the following code.
>>
>>Version: 2.6.24-rc2,
>>File: kernel/time/clocksource.c:417-432
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>static ssize_t
>>sysfs_show_available_clocksources(struct sys_device *dev, char *buf)
>>{
>> struct clocksource *src;
>> char *curr = buf;
>>
>> spin_lock_irq(&clocksource_lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(src, &clocksource_list, list) {
>> curr += sprintf(curr, "%s ", src->name);
>> }
>> spin_unlock_irq(&clocksource_lock);
>>
>> curr += sprintf(curr, "\n");
>>
>> return curr - buf;
>>}
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>sysfs_show_current_clocksources() also has the same problem though in
>>practice
>>the size of current clocksource's name won't exceed PAGE_SIZE.
>>
>>I fix the bug by using snprintf according to the specification of the kernel
>>(Version:2.6.24-rc2,File:Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt)
>>
>>Fix sysfs_show_available_clocksources() and
>>sysfs_show_current_clocksources()
>>buffer overflow problem with snprintf().
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>>---
>> kernel/time/clocksource.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>>index c8a9d13..5d5926f 100644
>>--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>>+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>>@@ -342,15 +342,13 @@ void clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource
>>*cs, int rating)
>> static ssize_t
>> sysfs_show_current_clocksources(struct sys_device *dev, char *buf)
>> {
>>- char *curr = buf;
>>+ ssize_t count = 0;
>>
>> spin_lock_irq(&clocksource_lock);
>>- curr += sprintf(curr, "%s ", curr_clocksource->name);
>>+ count = snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", curr_clocksource->name);
>
>Yes, snprintf is safer than sprintf. But here, the 'count' will be
>mis-pointed when snprintf returns no less than PAGE_SIZE (what you called
>overflow). So you may also need:
>
> if (unlikely(count >= PAGE_SIZE))
> count = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
>
>Just a simple guess. ;)
Or try scnprintf. ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists