linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47333ACB.6070408@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300
From:	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Johannes Weiner <hannes-kernel@...urebad.de>,
	"Michael (rabenkind) Brandstetter" <listen@...fservix.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at  acpi_battery_update

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call
>> acpi_battery_update() at all?
> 
> Alex?
Do you mean "why should it call _whole_ battery update?" ?
get_state should be sufficient in order to not get stale data.

Regards,
Alex.

View attachment "remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1734 bytes)