lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.0.999.0711081852170.1314@www.tglx.de>
Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:53:46 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] x86: apicdef.h unification



On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Robert Richter wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> On 06.11.07 21:32:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Thanks for doing this, but please check the x86 git repository
> > (cleanup / mm branch) for stuff which has been worked on already.
> > 
> > Maybe we need some coordination for this.
> 
> Is it for sure that the x86/cleanup tree will go upstream soon and the
> source will not change as much? The question is what code base to use
> for new patches? I want to keep the porting effort as small as
> possible.

We'll add patches on top of the cleanup branch. There should be not much 
changes, except if we have real functional changes.

	tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ