linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 1/2] hibernation: clean up Kconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1194545496.4793.28.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:11:36 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 1/2] hibernation: clean up Kconfig

> I assume this was against 2.6.23.  Please, it's not very useful to prepare
> patches against such an old kernel.  Even if the receiver were to fix te
> patch up, there isn't much confidence that it will actually work at
> compile-time and runtime.

No, it wasn't, I diffed it against -rc1. I tested the Kconfig changes
with "make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig" and "make ARCH=i386 menuconfig". As
far as I understand, the new x86 arch depends on being called as
ARCH=i386 or ARCH=x86_64. I may have misunderstood how the x86
architecture works but hoped Rafael would know more and tell me if I was
wrong.

joahnnes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)