linux-kernel - Re: Buffer overflow in CIFS VFS.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 23:28:24 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <czajnik@...jsoft.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steve French <smfrench@...tin.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow in CIFS VFS.

Not everyone has the time to read lkml.  Added Steve to Cc:, just in
case.

On Thu, 8 November 2007 22:20:03 +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> 
> I was looking at CIFS VFS code recently, trying to solve other issue,
> just to find something that looks like a buffer overflow  bug.
> The problem is in SendReceive() function in transport.c - it memcpy's
> message payload into a buffer passed via out_buf param. The function
> assumes that all buffers are of size (CIFSMaxBufSize +
> MAX_CIFS_HDR_SIZE) , unfortunately it is also called with smaller
> (MAX_CIFS_SMALL_BUFFER_SIZE) buffers.
> 
> To check this finding I patched Samba server to send oversized logoffX
> messages. With ~ 16kB messages the client running 2.6.23.1 crashed upon
> unmounting.
> 
> I've done a quick fix, available here:
> http://czajnick.sitenet.pl/cifs-buffer-overflow-fix.patch.gz

Jörn

-- 
When in doubt, punt.  When somebody actually complains, go back and fix it...
The 90% solution is a good thing.
-- Rob Landley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/