| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711090712440.13823@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 07:15:03 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8 > core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2, > comparing slab vs slub allocators. You saw the discussion at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119354245426072&w=2 and the patches / configurations that were posted to address the issues? Could you try these? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists