linux-kernel - Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4733BB7F.8010004@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:44:31 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, James Andrewartha <jamesa@....com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10

Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Thanks, it works like that.
> 
> Seems in libata there is no fall-back to non-DMA mode, if DMA didn't work.

There is, it's just too conservative about that.  With improvements
pending for 2.6.24, it should be quite snappy at falling back to PIO if
configured transfer mode doesn't seem to work at all (consecutive IO
command failures after transfer mode configuration change).

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/