linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071109161455.GB32088@skynet.ie>
Date:	Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:14:55 +0000
From:	mel@...net.ie (Mel Gorman)
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, nacc@...ibm.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

On (09/11/07 07:45), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> >  struct page * fastcall
> >  __alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> >  		struct zonelist *zonelist)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Use a temporary nodemask for __GFP_THISNODE allocations. If the
> > +	 * cost of allocating on the stack or the stack usage becomes
> > +	 * noticable, allocate the nodemasks per node at boot or compile time
> > +	 */
> > +	if (unlikely(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE)) {
> > +		nodemask_t nodemask;
> 
> Hmmm.. This places a potentially big structure on the stack. nodemask can 
> contain up to 1024 bits which means 128 bytes. Maybe keep an array of 
> gfp_thisnode nodemasks (node_nodemask?) and use node_nodemask[nid]?
> 

That is what I was hinting at in the comment as a possible solution.

> > +
> > +		return __alloc_pages_internal(gfp_mask, order,
> > +			zonelist, nodemask_thisnode(numa_node_id(), &nodemask));
> 
> Argh.... GFP_THISNODE must use the nid passed to alloc_pages_node and 
> *not* the local numa node id. Only if the node specified to alloc_pages 
> nodes is -1 will this work.
> 

alloc_pages_node() calls __alloc_pages_nodemask() though where in this
function if I'm reading it right is called without a node id. Given no
other details on the nid, the current one seemed a logical choice.

What I did notice when rechecking is I left the warning about THISNODE
in by accident :(

-- 
-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/