[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4734992C.7000408@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:30:20 -0800
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints
So, reiserfs and NFS are nesting i_mutex inside the mmap_sem.
>> [<b038c6e5>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
>> [<b01b17e9>] reiserfs_file_release+0x54/0x447
>> [<b016afe7>] __fput+0x53/0x101
>> [<b016b0ee>] fput+0x19/0x1c
>> [<b015bcd5>] remove_vma+0x3b/0x4d
>> [<b015c659>] do_munmap+0x17f/0x1cf
> [<ffffffff802686a1>] _mutex_lock+0x28/0x34
> [<ffffffff883e71d0>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x6d/0xac [nfs]
> [<ffffffff883e4b51>] nfs_file_mmap+0x5c/0x74 [nfs]
> [<ffffffff8020df7e>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x51a/0x817
> [<ffffffff80225d19>] sys_mmap+0x90/0x119
I think i_mutex is fundamentally nested outside of the mmap_sem because
of faulting in the buffered write path. I think these warnings could be
reproduced with a careful test app which tries buffered writes from an
address which will fault.
DIO just tripped it up because it *always* performs get_user_pages() on
the memory.
So reiser and NFS need to be fixed. No?
(reiser is grabbing i_mutex from any final fput? brave!)
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists