[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071110234706.GE24195@gallifrey>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:47:06 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
apparmor-dev <apparmor-dev@...ge.novell.com>
Subject: Re: AppArmor Security Goal
* david@...g.hm (david@...g.hm) wrote:
That I wrote:
> >If the adminisrator set something up with (2) as the starting point it
> >would seem reasonable for the user to be able to add the ability to edit
> >documents in extra directories for their style of organising documents
> >they work on; but they would be restricted in what they could add
> >so that they couldn't add the ability to write to their settings
> >files.
>
> but how can the system know if the directory the user wants to add is
> reasonable or not? what if the user says they want to store their
> documents in /etc?
I was assuming that in a system where the user can add stuff to
the profile the administrator would be able to either grant or exclude
paths that the user was able to add.
Dave
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists