linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Don't fail ata device revalidation for bad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47354258.30501@garzik.org>
Date:	Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:32:08 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	roppedisano@...racomspa.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't fail ata device revalidation for bad _GTF methods

Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Experience suggests that the _GTF method may be bad. We currently fail 
> device revalidation in that case, which seems excessive.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>

applied


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/