[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:50:51 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
CC: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn,
miklos@...redi.hu
Subject: Re: Temporary lockup on loopback block device
> > > Arguably we just have the wrong backing-device here, and what we should do
> > > is to propagate the real backing device's pointer through up into the
> > > filesystem. There's machinery for this which things like DM stacks use.
> > >
> > > I wonder if the post-2.6.23 changes happened to make this problem go away.
> >
> > The per BDI dirty stuff in 24 should make this work, I just checked and
> > loopback thingies seem to have their own BDI, so all should be well.
>
> This is not only about loopback (I think the lockup can happen even
> without loopback) --- the main problem is:
>
> Why are there over-limit dirty pages that no one is writing?
Please do a sysrq-t, and cat /proc/vmstat during the hang. Those
will show us what exactly is happening.
I've seen this type of hang many times, and I agree with Peter, that
it's probably about loopback, and is fixed in 2.6.24-rc.
Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists